The Spearhead Traverse is a 25km horseshoe-shaped route in the back country between Blackcomb and Whistler. The route is mostly within Garibaldi Park, and meanders through some of the most breathtaking scenery on the planet. Much of the route is across glaciers or snow-covered terrain (even in the height of summer). With ski touring equipment, the route can be done in a day. But what about running the route, using snow shoes when required? It seems to me that the traverse could be done in a manageable day by trail runners. I have not covered the entire route myself on foot, but the other day my daughter and I completed 17K of the route (from Russett Lake to Whistler Village) in an easy walk across mostly firm ground. In summer, the entire stretch from Singing Pass to Whistler Village (14K) is well-maintained single-track trail. Singing Pass, by the way, has fileds of summer wildflowers right out of the Sound of Music. The last stretch of trail (Singing Pass to Whistler Village) may not be included in the 25K estimated length typically provided in descriptions of the traverse. So, the actual length may be something closer to 40K. But either way, the route is not longer than what could be done by most trail runners in a managaeable day.
The Spearhead Traverse could be a great community running event next spring or summer. It's close enough to Whistler and Blackcomb that safety can be easily-handled, yet it's a route through true wilderness. Also, the combination of running and snow-shoeing would add to the appeal of the event. Of course, the route does cross glaciers (with names like "The Rip Saw" and "Shatter"), and some mountaineering (actually, it would technically be "scrambling') skills would be required. Participants would have to carry rescue gear and other kinds of safety equipment for the conditions. But I think that the spectacular scenery, combined with the fact that this route has not been completed by a group of runners (as far as I know, we would be the first, but please do correct me if you know of someone who has done this), would make this a cool and fun event.
What do you think? Is running across glaciers and avoiding crevasses the kind of thing you'd want to try?
I have included an image of the route to this post (with thanks to Matt Gunn).
Comments
Intersting idea.
Intersting idea. I've skied this spectacular route many times over the years (20 plus, but I've lost track) and I've seen it get more popular and busier every year. With the increased ease of access, the possibility of mountain huts and continued glacial retreat it will likely see a real increase in summer hiking and mountaineering visitors.
The challenge to "running" this is the 12 glaciers which one must cross, with related crevase, moat, bergshrund and avalanche risks. These risks get greater as spring moves into summer and the snow melts. One would have to make the call as to how much to require folks to "run" roped up. This trip is easiest with a big snow pack in the spring, so thats the best time to "run" it. In good spring conditions its a reasonable 12 hr ski trip, and a snowshoe run in these conditions could certainly be done in a day.
I'm interested
This is on my list so I'm definitely interested!!!
Great idea!
I have skied part of the traverse with some trailrunning buddies and agree that this would be an incredible run. I'm interested!
JP
Good to see the conversation moving along!
Using John Baldwin's excellent "Backcountry Whistler" map, which shows the entire route (with alternate side routes), I have roughly measured the full distance of the route to be 39K from the main lodge on Blackcomb, across the entire traverse, and back to the Whistler Village base (I have been going to Whistler since 1966, and for me, the Whistler base is what is now called Creekside; but it seems that the base for the resort is now fully assigned to what used to be the garbage dump, then became the Blackcomb Village, and is now the Whistler Village...). If we wanted to run up Blackcomb (instead of taking the gondola to the main Blackcomb lodge) the full route would be about 39K. The looping of the route is actually a distinct advantage; it would allow the start and the finish to be in the same place without making the course an out-and-back. Another perk! Also, using one of the small side routes shown by Baldwin, it would be easy to make this run 42K, and thus a full marathon distance. That would add again to the appeal.
Sounds Great
I'd definitely be interested in this as well. Sounds like an excellent plan.
Dave
Count me in!! ben
Count me in!!
ben